← The Reality File
Research
500 US and UK sustainability leaders · 2026
October 8, 2026

The four types of company on climate: Integrators, Declarers, Under claimers and Absentees

Two groups of companies announce net zero targets at almost the same rate. One funds them. The other mostly doesn't. From the outside they look identical.

By
The Reality Department

Key findings

  • 27% of organisations are Integrators: committed and built.
  • 28% are Declarers: a target and not much else.
  • 11% are Under claimers: doing the work without a formal target.
  • 33% are Absentees: no target, no structures, no spend.
  • Integrators and Declarers have public targets at similar rates (58% and 53%), but 76% of Integrators fund climate above 5% of CapEx against 21% of Declarers.

How were the segments built?

We scored all 500 organisations on what they say, meaning whether they hold a formal target, against six measures of delivery: CapEx, governance, Scope 3 measurement, supplier requirements, adaptation and target formality.

What are the four types?

Integrators (27%) are committed and built. Three-quarters fund climate above 5% of CapEx. 82% are confident of delivery. Two-thirds are large employers.

Declarers (28%) have a target and little behind it. 40% have no climate governance structure at all and only 21% fund it. This is the commitment gap in its purest form.

Under claimers (11%) have real capability and no formal target. 72% fund climate work. None have announced anything.

Absentees (33%) have no target, no structures and no spend. Over half have no governance. They are the largest single group.

The largest group has done nothing. The second largest has only announced

Share of organisations in each position

27%28%11%33%
  • Integrators: committed and built 27%
  • Declarers: a target and not much else 28%
  • Under claimers: real capability, no formal target 11%
  • Absentees: no target, no structures, no spend 33%
View data
The largest group has done nothing. The second largest has only announced
Answer%
Integrators: committed and built27%
Declarers: a target and not much else28%
Under claimers: real capability, no formal target11%
Absentees: no target, no structures, no spend33%
Base: 500 sustainability decision-makers (250 US, 250 UK). Figures total 99% due to rounding. Source: The Reality Department, The Climate Commitment Gap, wave 1, August 2026.The Reality Department

What they say against what they have built

Says →Does ↓Has a formal targetNo formal targetHas built delivery
27%Integrators
11%Under claimers
Has not built delivery
28%Declarers
33%Absentees
View data
What they say against what they have built
Has a formal targetNo formal target
Has built deliveryIntegrators 27%Under claimers 11%
Has not built deliveryDeclarers 28%Absentees 33%
Base: 500 sustainability decision-makers (250 US, 250 UK). Figures total 99% due to rounding. Source: The Reality Department, The Climate Commitment Gap, wave 1, August 2026.The Reality Department

How do you tell an Integrator from a Declarer?

Not from the announcement. 58% of Integrators have a public net zero target. So do 53% of Declarers.

The difference is underneath. Three-quarters of Integrators (76%) fund climate above 5% of CapEx, against 21% of Declarers. Nearly a third of Integrators (31%) measure Scope 3 comprehensively, against 7%. And 40% of Declarers have no climate governance at all, compared with 2% of Integrators.

From the outside, these two look the same

Integrators and Declarers compared

  • Integrators
  • Declarers
Has a public net zero target58%53%5 pts
Funds climate above 5% of CapEx76%21%55 pts
Measures Scope 3 comprehensively31%7%24 pts
Has no climate governance at all2%40%38 pts
View data
From the outside, these two look the same
MeasureIntegratorsDeclarersGap (points)
Has a public net zero target58%53%5
Funds climate above 5% of CapEx76%21%55
Measures Scope 3 comprehensively31%7%24
Has no climate governance at all2%40%38
Base: Integrators (135), Declarers (141). Source: The Reality Department, The Climate Commitment Gap, wave 1, August 2026.The Reality Department

What this means

A public target is the weakest signal available. It is the one thing Integrators and Declarers share.

If you are choosing a supplier, a partner or an investment on climate grounds, skip the announcement and ask about CapEx, governance and Scope 3. If you run sustainability comms, be clear which group you are in before the next statement goes out. A Declarer's announcement invites exactly the scrutiny it cannot meet.

And if you are an Under claimer, you are doing more than a quarter of the market that talks about it. Staying quiet may be a choice, but it should be a deliberate one.

Frequently asked questions

How can you tell if a company is serious about net zero?

Look at funding, governance and Scope 3 measurement, not the target. In The Reality Department's research, companies that deliver and companies that only declare have public targets at almost the same rate (58% and 53%).

How many companies have a net zero target but aren't funding it?

28% of organisations are Declarers: they hold a target, but only 21% of them direct more than 5% of CapEx to climate-aligned investment.

How many companies have no climate target at all?

33% of organisations are Absentees, with no target, no structures and no spend.

Methodology

The Reality Department surveyed 500 sustainability decision-makers: 250 in the United States and 250 in the United Kingdom. Fieldwork: August 2026. Segments were built by scoring each organisation on stated commitment against six delivery measures.

Related: How many companies are funding their net zero targets?

Want a segmentation of your own market? Work with us.

Read the full report

Want a study like this with your name on it?

Work with us